Skip to Content
Main content

HANNIBAL CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

241

44%

LEVEL 2

188

34%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

212

40%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

98

36%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

129

47%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

224

44%

LEVEL 2

180

35%

LEVEL 3

88

17%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

201

40%

LEVEL 2

181

36%

LEVEL 3

86

17%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

187

40%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

158

35%

LEVEL 2

179

39%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

54

76%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

237

44%

LEVEL 2

187

35%

LEVEL 3

93

17%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

210

40%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

190

49%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

174

44%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

231

44%

LEVEL 2

183

35%

LEVEL 3

86

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

204

40%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

89

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.