GRANBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

53

38%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

22

61%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

30

64%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

26

76%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

34

40%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.