NORTHSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

81

19%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

167

40%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

74

15%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

202

41%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

90

43%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

100

42%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

102

40%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

145

41%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

217
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

149

35%

LEVEL 3

178

42%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

167

43%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

201

44%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

137

43%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

181

46%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

38

39%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

36

37%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.