GOLDEN HILL ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

68

42%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

39

41%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

36

42%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

32

42%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

45

44%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

67

45%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

68

43%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

42

38%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

47

46%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

21

35%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.