WARWICK VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

116

17%

LEVEL 2

221

32%

LEVEL 3

210

31%

LEVEL 4

134

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

147

21%

LEVEL 2

217

31%

LEVEL 3

177

25%

LEVEL 4

168

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

87

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

75

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

270
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

64

13%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

104

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

267
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

90

17%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

128

25%

LEVEL 4

139

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

38

37%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

39

37%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

210

34%

LEVEL 3

209

33%

LEVEL 4

134

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

98

15%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

174

27%

LEVEL 4

168

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

49

74%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

345
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

135

19%

LEVEL 2

216

31%

LEVEL 3

177

25%

LEVEL 4

168

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

182

33%

LEVEL 4

119

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

90

16%

LEVEL 2

178

31%

LEVEL 3

150

26%

LEVEL 4

152

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

50

37%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

57

41%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

342
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

144

21%

LEVEL 2

215

31%

LEVEL 3

175

25%

LEVEL 4

167

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.