SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

335

57%

LEVEL 2

131

22%

LEVEL 3

80

14%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

367

55%

LEVEL 2

176

26%

LEVEL 3

92

14%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

141

53%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

149

47%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

194

60%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

218

62%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

89

68%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

94

68%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

205

62%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

214

59%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

257

52%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

80

16%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

279

49%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

92

16%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

78

87%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

88

89%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

213

47%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

127
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

248

47%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

122

90%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

119

86%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

63

32%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

260

66%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

304

64%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

43

9%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

298

55%

LEVEL 2

124

23%

LEVEL 3

76

14%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

331

53%

LEVEL 2

169

27%

LEVEL 3

91

15%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

36

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.