Skip to Content
Main content

FOSTERTOWN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

127

42%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

66

43%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

38

44%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

33

42%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

127

46%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

101

36%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

16

57%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

124

43%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

70

47%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

123

42%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.