GAMS HIGH TECH MAGNET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

117

44%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

134

50%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

56

43%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

55

41%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

59

44%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

79

59%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

30

49%

LEVEL 2

25

41%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

32

57%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

93

50%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

100

46%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

95

43%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

38

79%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

39

80%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

47

52%

LEVEL 2

42

46%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

67

70%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

108

46%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

127

52%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

109

44%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

117

48%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.