CENTRAL VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

71

44%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

60

44%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

59

45%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

101

37%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

160
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

90

41%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

98

45%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

42

49%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

47

45%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.