Skip to Content
Main content

MINISINK VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

109

21%

LEVEL 2

189

36%

LEVEL 3

158

30%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

123

23%

LEVEL 2

166

31%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

83

20%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

88

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

47

59%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

55

63%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

221
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

186

36%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

115

22%

LEVEL 2

161

31%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

220
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

108

21%

LEVEL 2

185

36%

LEVEL 3

157

31%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.