PINE TREE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

178

38%

LEVEL 3

161

35%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

109

21%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

89

39%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

21

46%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

23

48%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

86

40%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

18

42%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

153

39%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

167

38%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

43

60%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

201
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

171

38%

LEVEL 3

160

36%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

225
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

97

19%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

148

37%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

45

35%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.