Skip to Content
Main content

MAPLE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

132

27%

LEVEL 2

216

45%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

129

29%

LEVEL 2

200

44%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

116

47%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

103

44%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

23

45%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

53

47%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

46

44%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

138

48%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

125

48%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

197

47%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

187

47%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

34

55%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

37

70%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

188

44%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

118

28%

LEVEL 2

186

44%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

28

48%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

121

30%

LEVEL 2

183

45%

LEVEL 3

93

23%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

169

46%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

205

45%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

119

28%

LEVEL 2

191

45%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.