HIGHLAND FALLS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

40

48%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

36

41%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

28

47%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

29

45%

LEVEL 2

29

45%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

69

43%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.