VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

74

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

117

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

139

34%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

247
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

106

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

158

37%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

159

36%

LEVEL 4

116

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

37

59%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

36

56%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

234
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

160

34%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

284
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

64

13%

LEVEL 2

144

29%

LEVEL 3

167

34%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

144

35%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

109

26%

LEVEL 3

147

36%

LEVEL 4

114

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.