Skip to Content
Main content

GENEVA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

403

54%

LEVEL 2

191

26%

LEVEL 3

110

15%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 850

LEVEL 1

461

54%

LEVEL 2

220

26%

LEVEL 3

124

15%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

156

45%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

201

50%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

247

63%

LEVEL 2

95

24%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

260

58%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

52

12%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

56

58%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

63

56%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

110

35%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

131

38%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

69

82%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

74

80%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

166

72%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

191

67%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

299

49%

LEVEL 2

173

28%

LEVEL 3

107

17%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

341

48%

LEVEL 2

204

29%

LEVEL 3

120

17%

LEVEL 4

44

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

104

83%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

120

85%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

335

50%

LEVEL 2

182

27%

LEVEL 3

109

16%

LEVEL 4

38

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

380

50%

LEVEL 2

206

27%

LEVEL 3

124

16%

LEVEL 4

45

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

68

87%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

81

85%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

73

29%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

330

67%

LEVEL 2

107

22%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

370

66%

LEVEL 2

129

23%

LEVEL 3

51

9%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

169
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 845

LEVEL 1

457

54%

LEVEL 2

219

26%

LEVEL 3

124

15%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

385

53%

LEVEL 2

187

26%

LEVEL 3

110

15%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

447

54%

LEVEL 2

217

26%

LEVEL 3

124

15%

LEVEL 4

44

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

18

82%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.