GENEVA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

177

55%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

216

55%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

87

46%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

115

65%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

129

63%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

22

61%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

31

89%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

71

73%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

92

71%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

134

50%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

165

50%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

43

83%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

155

53%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

180

51%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

137

70%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

173

69%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

172

55%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

210

55%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.