CANANDAIGUA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

112

17%

LEVEL 2

145

23%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

182

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

127

20%

LEVEL 2

152

24%

LEVEL 3

190

30%

LEVEL 4

169

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

104

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

338
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

88

16%

LEVEL 2

122

22%

LEVEL 3

171

31%

LEVEL 4

167

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

319
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

103

18%

LEVEL 2

138

25%

LEVEL 3

171

31%

LEVEL 4

148

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

116

21%

LEVEL 3

201

37%

LEVEL 4

181

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

128

23%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

169

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

62

65%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

62

67%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

359
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

122

19%

LEVEL 2

151

24%

LEVEL 3

190

30%

LEVEL 4

169

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

87

20%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

154

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

274
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

142

35%

LEVEL 4

132

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.