Skip to Content
Main content

CANANDAIGUA PRIMARY-ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

156

22%

LEVEL 2

217

31%

LEVEL 3

243

34%

LEVEL 4

95

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

183

26%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

225

32%

LEVEL 4

45

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

124

36%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

302
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

136

22%

LEVEL 2

189

30%

LEVEL 3

223

36%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

242
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

155

25%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

201

32%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

181

31%

LEVEL 3

239

42%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

79

14%

LEVEL 2

230

40%

LEVEL 3

220

38%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

95

70%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

104

80%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

338
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

152

22%

LEVEL 2

212

30%

LEVEL 3

243

35%

LEVEL 4

95

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

269
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

175

25%

LEVEL 2

248

36%

LEVEL 3

224

32%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

184

43%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

164

41%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

106

37%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

124

41%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

270
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

178

26%

LEVEL 2

248

36%

LEVEL 3

225

32%

LEVEL 4

45

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.