Skip to Content
Main content

DR KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

212

82%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

170

77%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

84

74%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

67

71%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

128

87%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

103

81%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

178

81%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

143

77%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

159

78%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

129

75%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

53

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

41

85%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

172

80%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

132

75%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

40

87%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

208

82%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

165

77%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

183

80%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

155

79%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

29

91%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.