Skip to Content
Main content

BELLEVUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

143

69%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

130

68%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

67

66%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

56

61%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

76

72%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

74

74%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

88

71%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

77

75%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

23

77%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

98

61%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

45

96%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

123

66%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

114

67%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

20

91%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

136

71%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

122

68%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

122

69%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

108

67%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.