Skip to Content
Main content

EDWARD SMITH K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

219

49%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

191

44%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

96

43%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

80

36%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

123

55%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

111

54%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

48

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

142

67%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

121

57%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

76

82%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

74

79%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

169

44%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

140

38%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

50

88%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

51

81%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

45

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

201

64%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

168

55%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

216

49%

LEVEL 2

98

22%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

99

24%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.