SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

128

23%

LEVEL 3

239

43%

LEVEL 4

153

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

148

25%

LEVEL 3

224

38%

LEVEL 4

161

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

114

44%

LEVEL 4

81

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

199
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

122

43%

LEVEL 4

77

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

125

42%

LEVEL 4

72

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

377
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

228

42%

LEVEL 4

149

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

370
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

145

26%

LEVEL 3

216

38%

LEVEL 4

154

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

113

22%

LEVEL 3

236

45%

LEVEL 4

152

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

131

25%

LEVEL 3

217

41%

LEVEL 4

160

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

102

21%

LEVEL 3

207

43%

LEVEL 4

145

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

349
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

201

41%

LEVEL 4

148

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

32

41%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.