MARCELLUS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

83

13%

LEVEL 2

210

33%

LEVEL 3

218

34%

LEVEL 4

133

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

85

14%

LEVEL 2

190

31%

LEVEL 3

201

33%

LEVEL 4

136

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

122

41%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

328
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

75

12%

LEVEL 2

204

34%

LEVEL 3

205

34%

LEVEL 4

123

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

316
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

82

14%

LEVEL 2

183

31%

LEVEL 3

186

32%

LEVEL 4

130

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

48

8%

LEVEL 2

186

32%

LEVEL 3

211

37%

LEVEL 4

132

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

53

10%

LEVEL 2

174

31%

LEVEL 3

197

35%

LEVEL 4

133

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

35

52%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

32

58%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

348
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

79

12%

LEVEL 2

209

33%

LEVEL 3

216

34%

LEVEL 4

132

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

169

35%

LEVEL 4

118

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

163

33%

LEVEL 4

123

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

335
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

83

14%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

199

33%

LEVEL 4

136

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.