Skip to Content
Main content

DONALD S RAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

159

26%

LEVEL 2

171

28%

LEVEL 3

180

29%

LEVEL 4

108

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

185

28%

LEVEL 2

174

27%

LEVEL 3

169

26%

LEVEL 4

125

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

106

32%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

116

35%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

260
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

132

24%

LEVEL 2

152

28%

LEVEL 3

162

30%

LEVEL 4

98

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

262
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

159

28%

LEVEL 2

148

26%

LEVEL 3

153

27%

LEVEL 4

109

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

106

19%

LEVEL 2

161

29%

LEVEL 3

177

32%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

116

21%

LEVEL 2

154

28%

LEVEL 3

166

30%

LEVEL 4

123

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

53

78%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

69

73%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

134

28%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

90

19%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

108

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

66

47%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

95

52%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.