ONONDAGA HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

167

43%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

84

36%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

142

42%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

156

44%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

31

51%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.