ROXBORO ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

259

44%

LEVEL 2

193

33%

LEVEL 3

106

18%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

315

50%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

108

17%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

117

39%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

149

46%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

142

48%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

166

54%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

21

47%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

191

42%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

85

19%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

230

48%

LEVEL 2

121

25%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

178

35%

LEVEL 2

187

37%

LEVEL 3

102

20%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

230

43%

LEVEL 2

151

29%

LEVEL 3

105

20%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

81

89%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

85

87%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

247

43%

LEVEL 2

192

33%

LEVEL 3

104

18%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

152
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

300

49%

LEVEL 2

159

26%

LEVEL 3

108

18%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

15

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

78

29%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

84

32%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

181

55%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

231

63%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

242

43%

LEVEL 2

188

33%

LEVEL 3

103

18%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

302

50%

LEVEL 2

157

26%

LEVEL 3

105

17%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.