WEST GENESEE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

118

23%

LEVEL 2

184

36%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

108

22%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

108

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

98

22%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

80

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

136

31%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

108

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

45

69%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

210
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

182

36%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

233
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

100

21%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

108

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

190
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

57

42%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

231
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

107

22%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

107

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.