Skip to Content
Main content

LOUIS V DENTI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

29

38%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

26

38%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.