STARPOINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

555
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 906

LEVEL 1

92

10%

LEVEL 2

259

29%

LEVEL 3

337

37%

LEVEL 4

218

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

539
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 885

LEVEL 1

91

10%

LEVEL 2

255

29%

LEVEL 3

330

37%

LEVEL 4

209

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

302
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

103

24%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

128

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

295
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

167

40%

LEVEL 4

128

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

253
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

70

15%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

163

34%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

163

35%

LEVEL 4

81

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

527
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 844

LEVEL 1

81

10%

LEVEL 2

236

28%

LEVEL 3

321

38%

LEVEL 4

206

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

504
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 814

LEVEL 1

81

10%

LEVEL 2

229

28%

LEVEL 3

307

38%

LEVEL 4

197

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

533
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 815

LEVEL 1

60

7%

LEVEL 2

222

27%

LEVEL 3

318

39%

LEVEL 4

215

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

521
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 803

LEVEL 1

62

8%

LEVEL 2

220

27%

LEVEL 3

315

39%

LEVEL 4

206

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

32

35%

LEVEL 2

37

41%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

35

43%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

555
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 901

LEVEL 1

90

10%

LEVEL 2

256

28%

LEVEL 3

337

37%

LEVEL 4

218

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

487
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

193

26%

LEVEL 3

285

39%

LEVEL 4

202

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

478
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

62

8%

LEVEL 2

199

27%

LEVEL 3

288

39%

LEVEL 4

190

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.