Skip to Content
Main content

REGAN INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

173

33%

LEVEL 3

217

42%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

213

43%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

113

44%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

119

49%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

104

39%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

209

43%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

255
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

198

44%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

206

43%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

202

45%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

20

44%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

185

44%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

185

45%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

42

42%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.