Skip to Content
Main content

HARRY F ABATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

147

38%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

213

54%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

102

52%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

87

45%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

111

56%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

34

44%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

48

66%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

51

46%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

70

45%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

100

58%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

126

42%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

69

84%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

87

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

19

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

208

60%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

142

38%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

205

54%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.