Skip to Content
Main content

EMMET BELKNAP INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

213

45%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

86

18%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

261

48%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

74

14%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

145

54%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

134

40%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

41

71%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

32

58%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

170

40%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

83

20%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

185

41%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

43

83%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

76

84%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

147

55%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

187

56%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

207

45%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

251

47%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

74

14%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.