Skip to Content
Main content

AARON MOSSELL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

142

23%

LEVEL 2

247

40%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

95

51%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

37

49%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

211

41%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

57

88%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

69

64%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

98

54%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

229
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

139

23%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

155

25%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.