Skip to Content
Main content

LEWISTON-PORTER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

466
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

74

10%

LEVEL 2

180

25%

LEVEL 3

258

36%

LEVEL 4

208

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

107

14%

LEVEL 2

196

25%

LEVEL 3

262

34%

LEVEL 4

210

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

251
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

131

38%

LEVEL 4

120

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

257
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

136

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

215
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

88

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

215
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

14

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

427
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

61

9%

LEVEL 2

160

25%

LEVEL 3

240

37%

LEVEL 4

187

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

430
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

90

13%

LEVEL 2

176

25%

LEVEL 3

245

35%

LEVEL 4

185

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

25

4%

LEVEL 2

120

21%

LEVEL 3

235

40%

LEVEL 4

204

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

140

22%

LEVEL 3

243

39%

LEVEL 4

202

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

60

44%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

396
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

115

21%

LEVEL 3

219

40%

LEVEL 4

177

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

381
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

57

10%

LEVEL 2

129

23%

LEVEL 3

205

36%

LEVEL 4

176

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.