Skip to Content
Main content

PS 55 HENRY M BOEHM GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

37

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

44

40%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

63

43%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

99

41%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

84

38%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

102

44%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

15

30%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

113

41%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

80

45%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

66

39%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.