PS 57 HUBERT H HUMPHREY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

108

38%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

82

51%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

50

45%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

34

36%

LEVEL 2

39

41%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

71

70%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

117

40%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

78
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

119

44%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

118

40%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

94

37%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.