Skip to Content
Main content

PS 42 ELTINGVILLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

185

39%

LEVEL 4

112

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

129

25%

LEVEL 3

203

40%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

92

41%

LEVEL 4

61

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

95

39%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

108

41%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

22

45%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

86

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

227
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

84

23%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

151

43%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

183

48%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

53

42%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

295
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

183

40%

LEVEL 4

112

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

306
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

64

13%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

203

41%

LEVEL 4

103

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

144

44%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

291
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

121

26%

LEVEL 3

181

39%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

199

40%

LEVEL 4

101

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.