Skip to Content
Main content

PS 35 CLOVE VALLEY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

102

50%

LEVEL 4

67

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

86

46%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

42

46%

LEVEL 4

38

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

43

47%

LEVEL 4

37

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

60

54%

LEVEL 4

29

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

43

45%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

14

58%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

54

49%

LEVEL 4

46

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

48

48%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

23

56%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

10

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

79

51%

LEVEL 4

58

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

66

45%

LEVEL 4

59

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

23

49%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

20

50%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

85

46%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

54

45%

LEVEL 4

48

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

52

43%

LEVEL 4

48

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

48

59%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

34

50%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

100

51%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

144
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

83

45%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.