PS 23 RICHMONDTOWN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

102

40%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

110

42%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

44

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

52

39%

LEVEL 4

46

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

42

39%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

58

45%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

80

42%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

22

47%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

89

49%

LEVEL 4

56

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

86

48%

LEVEL 4

71

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

25

30%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

101

41%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

66

42%

LEVEL 4

43

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

68

41%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

36

39%

LEVEL 4

20

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

42

43%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

100

41%

LEVEL 4

71

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.