Skip to Content
Main content

PS 20 PORT RICHMOND GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

74

30%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

52

57%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

49

54%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

39

57%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.