Skip to Content
Main content

PS 3 MARGARET GIOIOSA SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

177

42%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

154

40%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

91

46%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

81

42%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

14

45%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

85

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

26

48%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

21

41%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

153

47%

LEVEL 4

94

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

135

45%

LEVEL 4

112

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

276
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

177

42%

LEVEL 4

99

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

130

41%

LEVEL 4

86

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

95

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

47

44%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

48

41%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

271
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

172

41%

LEVEL 4

99

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

152

40%

LEVEL 4

112

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.