Skip to Content
Main content

PS 4 MAURICE WOLLIN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

125

42%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

63

46%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

14

50%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

15

42%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

80

41%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

23

44%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

107

48%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

93

45%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

141

42%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

105

48%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

75

42%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

140

43%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

121

42%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.