QUEENS GATEWAY TO HEALTH SCI SEC GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

195

74%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

191

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

106

77%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

99

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

89

70%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

92

70%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

9

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

152
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

123

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

148
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

125

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

10

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

42

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

38

68%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

11

65%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

192

79%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

189

77%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

65

71%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

77

72%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

130

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

114

73%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

187

73%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

225
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

180

72%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

8

89%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

11

92%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.