OUR WORLD NEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER SCHOO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

194

42%

LEVEL 4

91

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

196

41%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

101

45%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

44

49%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

42

48%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

62

45%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

72

50%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

190

47%

LEVEL 4

88

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

189

45%

LEVEL 4

75

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

24

47%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

29

49%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

282
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

192

44%

LEVEL 4

90

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

271
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

195

42%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

54

43%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

150

41%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

142

40%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.