Skip to Content
Main content

PS 148 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

118

39%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

65

53%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.