Skip to Content
Main content

PS 17 HENRY DAVID THOREAU GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

63

51%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

66

51%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

55

41%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

26

50%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

41

64%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

19

42%

LEVEL 2

23

51%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

31

70%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

94

46%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

74

33%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.