Skip to Content
Main content

PS 70 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

155

42%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

151

39%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

25

49%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

77

45%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

71

40%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

141

44%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

139

42%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

21

39%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

202
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

144

47%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

209
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

134

43%

LEVEL 4

75

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

29

45%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

16

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

20

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

133

42%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.