ALBERT SHANKER SCH-VISUAL/PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

165

26%

LEVEL 2

175

27%

LEVEL 3

143

22%

LEVEL 4

159

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

172

26%

LEVEL 2

172

26%

LEVEL 3

135

20%

LEVEL 4

186

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

90

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

107

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

89

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

154
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

106

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

28

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

51

46%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

46

44%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

80

16%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

157

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

93

17%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

130

24%

LEVEL 4

184

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

85

66%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

79

71%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

300
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

159

27%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

159

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

320
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

135

22%

LEVEL 2

159

26%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

186

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

37

73%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

43

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

59

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

157

28%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

116

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

164

29%

LEVEL 2

157

28%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

127

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

295
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

151

25%

LEVEL 2

168

27%

LEVEL 3

137

22%

LEVEL 4

158

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

310
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

157

25%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

182

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.