Skip to Content
Main content

PS 2 ALFRED ZIMBERG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

89

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

53

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

50

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

39

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

16

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

20

37%

LEVEL 4

21

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

51

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

43

39%

LEVEL 4

43

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

90

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

83

39%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

25

49%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

184
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

93

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

88

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

37

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

33

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

77

38%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

191
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

184
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

85

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.