Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 147 RONALD MCNAIR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

123

32%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

74

37%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

88%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

116

33%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

138

40%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

11

58%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

122

40%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

50

65%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

38

50%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

43

44%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.